The Role of Legitimate Customers as Mediators of Return Policy Leniency


Date Published : 14 September 2026

Contributors

Naufal Al Farisi Hermawan

Universitas Siliwangi
Corresponding Author

Keywords

Return Policy Leniency Legitimate Customers Customer Satisfaction Return Proclivity E-Commerce.

Proceeding

Track

General Track

License

Copyright (c) 2026 International Seminar and Conference on Management, Research, and Transformation (I-SMART)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

The rapid development of e-commerce requires companies to align customer satisfaction and operational efficiency through appropriate return policies. This study aims to examine how the five dimensions of Return Policy Leniency affect customer satisfaction and return proclivity in the Indonesian context. Unlike previous studies that were limited to the American context and did not consider the role of legitimate customers, this study specifically aims to analyze the mediating role of legitimate customers in the relationship between Return Policy Leniency and customers satisfaction. This study uses an explanatory quantitative approach with CB-SEM analysis to test the relationship between variables, with the unit of analysis being individual e-commerce consumers who have experience making product returns. The results show that the monetary, effort, and scope dimensions have a positive effect on customer satisfaction, while excessive leniency increases return proclivity. The legitimate customers variable significantly mediates this relationship, where legitimate e-commerce customers view moderate return policies as a form of fairness and transparency that strengthens trust and loyalty. This study expands the Return Policy Leniency Theory by incorporating the ethical aspect of legitimate customers in the context of Indonesian e-commerce. Practically, these results provide guidance for online businesses to design return policies that are fair, efficient, and oriented towards customer trust.

References

Baden, D., & Frei, R. (2021). The paradox of liberal return policies: Balancing customer satisfaction and operational efficiency in e-commerce. Journal of Retail Management, 47(3), 214–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretman.2021.03.005
Duong, Q. H., Zhou, L., Meng, M., Dang, L. T. A., & Nguyen, T. D. (2025). Striking the right balance: Customising return policy leniency for managing customer online return proclivity and satisfaction. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 85, 104315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104315
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8 (ed.)). Cengage Learning.
Hipólito, S., Dias, P., & Pereira, R. (2025). Understanding legitimate and illegitimate returners in online retailing: Ethical perspectives and behavioral outcomes. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 49(1), 98–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12890
Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4 (ed.)). Guilford Press.
Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2021). Marketing management (16 (ed.)). Pearson Education.
Magano, J., Ramos, C., Lopes, A., & Nunes, P. (2023). Return proclivity and post-purchase behavior in online shopping: The moderating role of consumer ethics. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 22(4), 601–615. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.2134
Prayogo, D., Domanski, R., & Golinska-Dawson, P. (2024). Challenges of reverse logistics and return management in Indonesian e-commerce. Sustainability, 16(7), 3124. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16073124
Stevenson, T., & Rieck, J. (2024). E-commerce return policy leniency and its implications for consumer trust: A comparative study. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 61, 102293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2024.102293

Downloads

How to Cite

The Role of Legitimate Customers as Mediators of Return Policy Leniency (N. A. F. Hermawan, Trans.). (2026). International Seminar and Conference on Management, Research, and Transformation (I-SMART), 1, 684-693. https://conference.unsil.ac.id/ismart/paper/view/196